www.geadopteerd.org

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Share on facebook
Start Info Artikels/media
Artikels/media

Adoptie is HOT. Ook in de media. Dagelijks verschijnt er wel ergens een artikel in krant/tijdschrift of een uitzending op tv. Ook het internet is een enorme bron van informatie over het thema. Helaas is er ook heel wat 'rommel' in omloop. Wij zijn van mening dat jullie geen boodschap hebben aan weer een bericht over de zoveelste celebrity die zo 'grootmoedig' is geweest om een arm kindje te adopteren. Wij willen ons dan ook uitdrukkelijk distantiëren van deze 'verhyping' van adoptie.
Wij proberen hier om de relevante berichtgeving te filteren en te verzamelen. Relevant vanuit het oogpunt van de geadopteerde. Veel leesplezier (alwhoewel ... sommige berichten zijn niet echt leuk te noemen maar wel interessant!).

ps. Waar mogelijk vermelden we steeds een bron en plaatsen we een link naar het brondocument.



Interview Mary Gauthier - Back to her roots

E-mail Print PDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Back to her roots

Being adopted has inspired Mary Gauthier like no artist before her

Over 13 years and six albums, singing in that cracked voice that channels Johnny Cash’s last days, Mary Gauthier has established a reputation as one of the finest American songwriters around. Although tracks such as I Drink, Mercy Now and Different Kind of Gone are snapshots of a life laid bare, nothing prepares you for the searing honesty of her new album, The Foundling — a song cycle about adoption.

Most female songwriters — even those for whom soul-baring, self-loathing, angst and unrequited or broken love affairs are sources of inspiration — have skirted round the subject. One might think that being abandoned at birth would prove fertile ground for creativity, but perhaps this is too raw an emotion to expose. While Gauthier has tackled the pain head on, other adoptee songwriters — Diana Jones, Gillian Welch, Sarah McLachlan — have been more oblique.

In literature, the foundling has always been a popular subject. Read the Old Testament, fairy tales, Greek tragedy, Shakespeare, novels and comic books, and you will find Moses, Snow White, Oedipus, Perdita in The Winter’s Tale, Tom Jones and Superman. Because life likes to imitate art, reuniting adopted children with their birth mother is a popular media story — especially if, like Clare Short or Joni Mitchell, the mother has a high profile — with an upbeat message.

A baby
A FOUNDLING
Unwanted
LOOKING
Unloved and unblessed
FOR
Left on a doorstep
HOME
An unbidden guest
WANDERS
A shivering shadow
THROUGH
A child with no name
DARKNESS
Severed
AND
Surrendered
TRAVELS
Sinking in pain
ALONE

Conceived in the gale of a ruinous storm
Partially killed, partially born
Abandoned, abandoned, falling through space
With nobody's eyes and nobody's face
A foundling

A child disconnected who no longer dries
With a prisoners stare and an orphans eyes
A free floating phantom held together by skin
A small helpless stranger, a sign in the wind

Washed into this work in fever and flood
Tears remorse, sorry and blood
Abandoned, abandoned left at the gate
Cut loose un-tethered tattooed by fate
A Foundling.

In fiction, the foundling is a blank slate on which to create a life unburdened by the past. In reality, says Gauthier, “it feels like you’re falling through space eternally”. More than 40 years after she was left in St Vincent’s Women’s and Infants’ Asylum in New Orleans, she tracked down her birth mother. That first stilted, apologetic conversation is recounted in March 11, 1962, the emotional centre of both the album and her current live shows. In the third verse, the lyrics hit you like a slow-motion car crash: “You say that I’m a secret nobody knowsyou can’t talk about it nowyou really gotta go.”

Yet the question that had dogged Gauthier all her life — “Who am I?” — had in part been answered. “I had found my birth mother. It wasn’t what I wanted to find, but there’s not a question mark any more. The little kid in me is gonna be dealing with abandonment until my last breath. I’m driven to write songs as a way of making sense of my life.

Most songwriters — like most people — have a family and know where they come from. Adoptees can lack that sense of place. Raised in an emotionally troubled family, Gauthier always felt she “didn’t belong”. “I always knew I was gay. I was an alcoholic from my first drink. There was just a hole. I had to get sober and start to heal from addiction before I could create art,” she explains.

“The interesting thing about being adopted,” says the singer-songwriter Diana Jones, “is, potentially, you could be from anywhere, from any kind of family, any kind of background. I grew up having all these fantasy families in my head. All my childhood, I had a sense of longing for home, a need to belong. I had to find me before I could figure out what I wanted to write, and that took time.”

Growing up just outside New York listening to show tunes, the Stones and the Beatles, Jones had fallen in love with Johnny Cash’s At Folsom Prison and found herself drawn to roots music. She finally tracked down her mother’s family in Tennessee. Her grandfather Robert Lee Maranville, who had once played with Chet Atkins, had a similar-sounding voice.

“I do believe there is a genetic connection between where I come from and the music I play,” she says. “Finding my biological family explained so much about who I am, but it took me a while to feel like I could claim it.” After her grandfather died in 2000, Jones, who had previously released two indifferent albums, found her voice — My Remembrance of You (2006) and Better Times Will Come (2009) are gems, more roots than country, full of beautifully observed songs set off by the warmth of her voice. Pony, about a Native American child taken from a reservation and placed in a settlement school, and All God’s Children, about kids who leave foster care at 18 with nowhere to go, are songs not just informed but enhanced by her experience. “I’m only interested in true stories,” she says. “For me, it’s to make sense of my story, but also to make sense of it in the context of the world.”

Gillian Welch’s adoptive parents were entertainers who moved to LA to write for The Carol Burnett Show. Her biological mother hailed from the mountains of North Carolina and her father was a drummer. Like Gauthier, she doesn’t do happy, preferring to chronicle the misfortune and torments that befall the disconnected living on society’s edge. Abandonment in all its forms — drug addiction, poverty, the wreckage of love — is the spine that runs through her songs.

Some adoptees, however, have fewer issues. “I got told I was adopted when I was nine, and it was never a big deal to me,” says the Canadian singer Sarah McLachlan. “I met my birth mother when I was 18. It was neat, because so many things I felt started to make sense, but, especially after I became successful, she wanted too much. I have a mother already. The older I become, the more I realise I am more like her through environmental conditioning.”

As Joni Mitchell has discovered, giving up your child for adoption is both a catalyst for creation and a scar that never heals. In 1965, when she was a penniless art student, she handed over her baby girl. She didn’t speak about it publicly for 30 years, but the clues were stamped all over her songs — especially Little Green, from Blue. “It left a hole in me,” she said, “that I didn’t fill until the day I saw her again. In some ways, my gift for music and writing was born out of tragedy and loss.”

When touring with Jones, Gauthier found they had much in common. Both had been adopted into dysfunctional families, left home at 15 and lived rough; and both have adoptive brothers with drug problems. Music was not part of their childhood — “There were no books, no music, no art,” Jones says — and they came to it relatively late. Jones was an artist, Gauthier a chef who wrote her first song at 35.

During their discussions, Jones introduced Gauthier to the work of BJ Lifton, an advocate of adoption reform. “Her books helped me to understand, to the point where I knew I was ready to write this record,” Gauthier says. “I wanted to write it as a song cycle, like Willie Nelson did with Red Headed Stranger; to start at the beginning, work to some sense of redemption and, in the end, come out and say, ‘I still believe in love.’”

“On a good day,” she says, “I believe. On a hard day, I need to believe.”

Robin Eggar

> Bron: The Sunday Times

 

"More than the sum of our losses"

E-mail Print PDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

"I suppressed any notion of being Asian and just thought of myself as white." Suki Leith was adopted by an American family in the 1960s, she tells the BBC why the Korean government needs to change the laws regarding international adoption.

Even though I study adoption and write about adoption and read countless media and academic articles about adoption; even though I read books and memoirs and watch films by adoptees and adoptive parents; even though my personal social circle is heavily populated with adoptees - domestic, transracial, international, same race - believe it or not, most of the time I do not sit around thinking about adoption losses.

Most days I get up and go to work, take care of the household chores, talk with my kids, take them to their activities, make dinner, take the dog for a walk, do the dishes and laundry, study and read and study and read, hang out with friends, and participate in numerous volunteer or community events. Most days I don't think about what I've lost by being a transnational, transracial adoptee.

But today, I am thinking about those losses. Several hundred adoptees like myself are in Seoul right now, attending the IKAA Gathering, and I am at home. There is both a sadness and a sense of relief of having to be stuck at home studying this August instead of being with many friends and fellow Korean adoptees at the conference.

I've been to the past two IKAA Gatherings and there is no way to adequately express what it feels like to be surrounded by 600+ others who have experienced the same life experience of being adopted out of our country of birth. 600 of us is a small number compared to the 200,000+ in South Korea's 50+ year history of adoption, and I am sure if it did not cost so much to travel to Korea, many more would be there.

It is hard to convey what it feels like to know you don't have to explain why you are who you are - why you look Korean but don't speak the language, why you always have to explain how you fit in your family, and why you sit on the fence between a cultural identity you don't physical match and a racial identity you don't culturally match. Who else knows the frustration of being told constantly through our lives that we should be grateful for not growing up in this country where we are now spending lots of our hard-earned money so we can get a tourist's version, a "Korea 101-lite" and trinkets at the market to put up on our walls than someone else - in fact several hundred others - who have been there and done that.

And yet, being in Korea at the IKAA Gatherings sometimes makes me very angry. I get angry that the country that didn't want me and wouldn't provide for me now wants me to come back and put on a happy, smiley face. I get so damn frustrated when I meet adoptees from all ages and backgrounds who share how unprepared their adoptive parents were in dealing with racism, racial identity struggles and understanding adoption losses.

There were times, when I was at past Gatherings, that being with 600+ other adoptees who all experienced this huge loss made me overwhelmingly sad. Looking around and seeing so many others who had lost their Korean families and had been adopted to mostly white European, American or Australian families - how could I not feel sadness, when basically, we were a room full of survivors - a room full of people abandoned, abused, neglected, rejected - who somehow found the means to find each other. It's basically one huge support group.

Most days, I don't think about these things. I don't want to think about these things. I don't want to feel the pain and sadness associated with being adopted. But then I listen to a documentary like this BBC report. I read and view an art installation, A Collection of One, that showcases the impact of all of us who have been adopted from South Korea.

Or, I read something poignant by a fellow adoptee. Yesterday, another fellow adoptee posed on her facebook page the question,

A diagnosis is not a destiny. Or does it have to be? Once called "at-risk & special needs" and more, I can testify that one can out-do and out-live a diagnosis. At least to live a productive, happy, and fulfilling life. But how often do people live up to the expectations of a diagnosis, just because that's expected?

My response was this: "I think it's easier for some to live a self-fulfilling prophecy than to spend our lives convincing both ourselves and others that we are more than the sum of our childhood losses."

I rarely write about my personal feelings about my adoption experience, especially in the past several years. I also turn down any request for interviews with the media, like this BBC documentary, when I believe they want me to walk down that path of "do you get along with your adoptive parents?" or "how was your adoption experience?" I turn down such requests for a few reasons: first of all, my adoptive experience is much more complex and layered and nuanced than a sentence or two that is published in an interview can adequately express and it always ends up being framed as "good" or "bad." I hate that dichotomy, and I hate it when something that might be negative gets turned into a statement about my adoptive parents that portrays them as bad parents. So while I want to write about some of the not-so-great things about being a Korean adoptee, I don't want to be pathologized nor do I want people to judge and pathologize my adoptive parents.

Secondly, I tend to really want to focus on the larger structural issues that are at play in the adoption-industry machine and to always frame adoption as one family's story negates those larger structural problems and societal attitudes. As often as possible, I want to focus attention on the ocean, not on the individual starfish.

But I'm going to be honest today, and admit that today, I'm feeling sad. I'm feeling loss and grief. Several years ago, my grandmother passed away. I was very close to my grandmother; she was the one person in my family that constantly made me feel that she was the lucky one to have me in her life. Last weekend I saw my grandfather and his new wife. While I think highly of my grandfather's wife and am very happy she is in our lives, every time I see her I can't help but feel sadness over the loss of my grandmother. It doesn't mean I don't love this person, it just means she is not my grandmother and I have the right to love the one without feeling guilty for having loved the other. And no one in the family has the expectation that we'll all forget about my grandmother because my grandfather remarried. It would be ridiculous.

I may have gained many things by being adopted to the U.S., but I've also suffered many losses. And while I believe I am much more than the sum of my childhood losses, there are days when sadness bubbles up and overwhelms me. Because it's hard. For many of us adoptees, it would be easier to just shove all those feelings of loss and grief way down deep, compartmentalize them, and throw away the key. For others, it is easier to let ourselves stay overwhelmed with grief. I totally understand why many adoptees don't make it. As difficult as it may be to believe, every time I hear about an adoptee who has killed themselves, I understand. For many adoptees it IS easier to live up to the expectation that we are no more than the sum of our losses and our "at-risk" and "special-needs" diagnoses. I've had to work hard to convince myself that I am more than the sum of my childhood losses - and having to constantly prove to greater society as well takes a heavy toll.

My adoptive parents were great parents and I'm fortunate that we still have a good relationship. However, having a good adoptive home did not erase the losses I've suffered. There is nothing that my American, middle-class upbringing could have done to erase the loss of my Korean family and culture and language. I am tired of this prevailing assumption that as long as the adoptive parents are "good" ones, the adoptee won't ever feel loss and grief. I'm really exasperated at this notion that a "well-adjusted adoptee" is one who never questions adoption loss, who never feels sadness or grief, or who never goes through an identity crisis over who s/he is and where s/he belongs. I hate that we are constantly told that we should "get over it."

I'm not going to defend adoption - in any manner, shape, or form - today. I'm not going to add a caveat that "it's better than an orphanage" or "it's better than lingering in foster care." I'm not going to be "balanced" in my analysis. Because this isn't an analysis. This is about feelings. Which I, and every other adoptee, is allowed to have, without justification and without a parenthetical about how of course we love our adoptive parents. I'm not going to accept comments on this post either, because this isn't about anyone else but how I'm feeling right now, right here, and I don't want advice on how to "get over it" or suggestions that I get therapy or any of the things that we adoptees are often told.

Recently I heard one adoption "expert" (not an adoptee, of course) state that despite the losses involved in adoption, as an institutional child welfare practice, "adoption is still the best intervention we have for children who are parentless." Every generation of adoptive parents think they're doing a better job than the ones before, and some are downright glib and smug about it. Get over it. As an "intervention" adoption gave me a home and a family but it did not "cure" the losses that caused me to be in need of a home and a family. Adoption is not a cure, it's a treatment that - if the adoptee is lucky and it's done well - potentially helps makes the sorrow manageable.

Bron: Harlow's Monkey blog

 

Adoptees seek more than roots

E-mail Print PDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Korean adoptees from over 20 different countries pose for a photo at the International Korean Adoptee Associations Gathering 2010 on Wednesday. (Lee Sang-sub/The Korea Herald)

The Korea Herald - The International Korean Adoptee Associations is looking to change the perception that the Korean public have of Korean adoptees by bringing their professions, knowledge and unique link to other countries to the table.

Over 500 adoptees gathered for the opening ceremony of the IKAA 2010 Gathering at the Lotte Hotel in Seoul this Wednesday. 
The adoptees, from late teens to those in their 50s, and their loved ones from 20 different countries came to participate in the gathering.
The IKAA is holding a range of events for both Korean adoptees and the public till Sunday.
This year’s gathering has an emphasis on promoting dialogue and a greater understanding between Korean adoptees and Korean society.

Stories of Korean adoptees used to arouse pity from people.
I don’t feel like we need or want to be charity cases,” said Tim Holm, president of both the IKAA and the Asian Adult Adoptees of Washington. “We want to do more meaningful activities for the adoptees other than just birth searches or living in Korea and teaching English. We really want to be able to promote business and professional exchanges."

He also pointed out that there are many educated adoptees who would be able to do much for the Korean government and Korean people. 

On the planning committee alone for this gathering, there is a long list of professionals. Holm himself is a CPA, Liselotte Hae-Jin Birkmose has a Master’s degree in art history and works for an international art investment company. From the Netherlands, Floor Eusterbrock works as a Marketing Communication Executive. Lisa Ellingson, from Minnesota, is an attorney in the area of business litigation. Tae Yang Jorgenson, from Denmark, holds a Master’s of Science in IT and works as an advisor in the administration of the Ministry of Climate and Energy.

For the first time ever, the IKAA gathering will be hosting a business seminar on Friday to further promote that theme. The Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency has agreed to participate and help facilitate networking between Korean adoptees and Korean businesses.

One of the events already held was the second International Symposium on Korean Adoption Studies. The symposium consisted of 12 different studies and their findings on and for the Korean adoptee community. 

Professor Kim Park Nelson, an adoptee herself, is the lead organizer and proceedings editor for this year’s symposium and also the one in 2007. Nelson is an assistant professor of American Multicultural Studies at the Minnesota State University at Moorhead.

There have been studies done on the Korean adoptee community since the 1950s. But according to Nelson “the research doesn’t speak to us, it speaks to adoptive parents, agencies and society as a whole”.

Nelson was asked by the IKAA to create a research symposium. Unhappy with the research already out there, she developed the 2007 symposium with the primary motive of sharing information with the adoptee community. She was hoping to encourage the researchers to be mindful of the population they did their studies on.

The symposium consisted of 12 panelists from all over the world, many of whom were adoptees themselves.

They covered a broad range of topics about unwed mothers in Korea, Korean adoptee identity, Korean adoptee politics and more.

Some of the research covered the question of why adoptions are so common in Korea.

According to Kimberly McKee’s research, only 10.9% of the country’s GDP was spent on social welfare in 2008, putting Korea as the second lowest spender on social welfare among OECD countries.

Yang Min-ok and Han Boon-young, researchers at Soongsil University, have interviewed single mothers who have felt the adverse effects of such lack of spending.

If you call service numbers starting with 080 and 1588 they will tell you that ‘we only accept teen mothers.’ They say that older women cause too much trouble,” said a research participant.

And research has found that it is not only the lack of economic support but also stigmas from society that affect the mothers as well.

In 2009, the Korean Women’s Development Institute and the Korean Unwed Mothers Support Network found that Korean people associate unwed mothers with carelessness, irresponsibility and sexual cheapness and are recognized as the second most discriminated group in Korea.

The perception of the unwed child rearing mother is the worst. Like a criminal,” said the same participant in Han and Yang’s study.

David Smolin, a law professor at Samford University, says that although international adoption is not a bad thing, more needs to be done to keep the birth families together. 

During the opening ceremony former first lady Lee Hee-ho wholeheartedly congratulated those at the gathering and welcomed them to Korea. She also expressed her sincere appreciation and wished to pay her respects to the adoptive families. 

Senator Lee Nak-yon also agreed with Holm in that adoptees are not subjects to feel pity for. He believed that adoptees are to be respected for overcoming uneasy childhoods with positive attitudes. 

The IKAA is a bigger network of non-profit adoptee organizations.

The IKAA Gathering 2010 is sponsored by numerous Korean and foreign companies. However, Tim Holm expressed sadness that the Overseas Korean Foundation had withdrawn their support for the IKAA and did not fund this year’s gathering. In 2004 and 2007, the OKF had donated over $200,000.

By Robert Lee ( Dit e-mail adres is beschermd tegen spambots, u heeft Javascript nodig om het te kunnen zien. )

Bron: The Korea Herald

 

Geadopteerd.be in de media

E-mail Print PDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Op 10 juni waren San-Ho en Benny van het geadopteerd.be-team te gast in de studio's van ROBtv voor het live programma ROBstudio. Ze gaven meer uitleg over het project voor geadopteerden waarvan zij mede-oprichters zijn.

Uitzending van woensdag 26 mei
"Adoptie uit verre landen verbieden?"
San-Ho van geadopteerd.be was te gast in de studio.

> Beluister hier de uizending

Uitzending van donderdag 27 mei
"De twee Korea's"
Sarah van geadopteerd.be was te gast in de studio.

> Beluister hier de uizending

Beiden wonen ze in Belgie en zijn geadopteerd maar
komen uit 2 héél verschillende werelddelen.
Zij vonden elkaar op onze
eerste Dag van de Geadopteerden
en zijn sindsdien dikke vriendinnen...

> Beluister hier de uizending (fragment begint op 1u 49min 40sec)
of lees het
verhaal over hun ontmoeting
 

Steeds meer adopties in Vlaanderen, steeds minder in Wallonië

E-mail Print PDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Terwijl adoptie in Vlaanderen jaar na jaar aan populariteit wint, gebeurt onder de taalgrens net het omgekeerde. Dat bericht De Zondag op basis van statistieken van de federale overheid. Daaruit blijkt dat er in Vlaanderen vorig jaar 523 adopties waren, tegenover 297 in Wallonië. Twee jaar geleden was die situatie heel anders, met 393 adopties in Vlaanderen en 403 in Wallonië.

Sinds de nieuwe adoptiewet van 2005 zijn er in ons land 3.301 kinderen geadopteerd, 1.493 jongens en 1.808 meisjes. Topjaar tot dusver was 2008, met in totaal 831 adopties in heel België. Vorig jaar zakte dat aantal licht tot 820. Vooral buitenlandse adoptie blijft populair: van de 820 geadopteerde kinderen in 2009 kwamen er 482 uit het buitenland en 338 uit eigen land. In 2009 kozen meer adoptieouders voor een meisje (426 tegenover 394 jongens). In 2008 werden nog bijna evenveel jongens als meisje geadopteerd. Uit de cijfers blijkt volgens De Zondag ook dat er in 2009 voor het eerst een homokoppel een kind kon adopteren.

Bron > Nieuws.be (foto: hbvl.be)

 

leven op de kruising van culturen

E-mail Print PDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
nvdr.: Mooie column over broers en zussen , adoptiemoeders en culturen die kruisen...

Het is passen en meten, niet alleen met de coalitie, maar ook in het dagelijks leven

Ik had mijn adoptiemoeder uit Groningen aan de lijn, die mij op mijn 40ste heeft geadopteerd. Of eigenlijk adopteer je op die leeftijd elkaar. Ik vroeg op wie ze had gestemd. Toch op Wilders, ja. Ze wilde hem een kans geven. Ze had nog gedacht of ze tegen mij zou liegen vertelde ze, maar had toch besloten dat niet te doen, wat ik wel weer tof van haar vond. Wil je me nu nog wel zien, vroeg ze voor de grap en misschien ook wel een heel klein beetje voor het echt. Ik lachte, maar voelde dat voor vaagheid geen ruimte was: ja, natuurlijk.

Halfhartig
Ik moest er een seconde over nadenken, maar bedacht gelijk dat je met mensen in je leven niets te kiezen hebt. Ze zijn er en ze zijn wie ze zijn. Er is een tijd geweest dat de mensen die deel uitmaakten van mijn leven daar in moesten passen. Geen halfhartige relaties, geen onoverbrugbare kloven en toch voor de beleefdheid elkaar zien, geen kromme tenen. Nee, helder, eerlijk en oprecht. Ik was er bijzonder trots op. Tot je gelukkig rijper wordt en begrijpt dat de kunst niet is dat je alleen met mensen omgaat van wie het makkelijk houden is.

Terwijl ik naar mijn adoptiemoeder luisterde, bekeek ik de ronde hennavlek in mijn rechter handpalm. Twee dagen daarvoor hadden we de henna-avond van mijn zusje gevierd. Omdat ze in Turkije gaat trouwen, had mijn moeder besloten de henna-avond, die gebruikelijk aan de bruiloft voorafgaat, in Nederland te houden voor vrienden en familie die niet in Turkije aanwezig zouden zijn.

Locatie: de kantine van voetbalvereniging Barbaros in Hengelo. Mijn zusje had een rode jurk aan die door mijn moeder was gemaakt vanwege haar afwijkende maat. Ik maakte haar mooie ogen op. Ze vroeg of ik het litteken in haar linker wenkbrauw wilde wegwerken. Ik voelde intimiteit. Ik had nooit gedacht dat mijn zusje zich daaraan stoorde. Terwijl ik de witte streep in haar wenkbrauw met bruin poeder vulde, dacht ik aan het moment waarop ze dat litteken opliep.

Spekglad
Het was winter, zij was 4 en ik 14. Het was koud en spekglad. Ik stond buiten voor de flat met een vriendin heen en weer te wiebelen op het ijs.

Twee dagen daarvoor hadden we de henna-avond van mijn zusje gevierd
Mijn zusje keek vanachter de ruit naar ons. Ik merkte wel dat ze zin had om mee te doen, maar ik sloeg daar geen acht op. Tot ze door mijn moeder naar buiten werd gebracht. Als oudste zus werd er automatisch van mij verwacht dat ik op haar paste, waar ik geen zin in had. We wiebelden verder.

Mijn zusje stond op de stoep naar ons te kijken. Toen al was ze ver weg, in zichzelf gekeerd, onbereikbaar. Ik weet nog dat ze een ongelooflijk kleine dopneus had. En dik donkerblond haar. Ze was heel klein voor haar leeftijd, niet per se tenger, maar klein. Ze droeg een jas die te krap was. Mijn moeder had haar handen, bij gebrek aan handschoenen, in de nauwe zakken gewurmd. Ik keek naar mijn zusje. Ze bewoog niet. Vanuit het niets gleed ze uit en viel, in slowmotion, voorover. Ik zag de in de zakken gewurmde handen, de reflex, en dat ze de handen er niet uit kreeg. Ik moest heel hard lachen, terwijl mijn zusje keihard huilde.

Handpalm
En nu was ze de bruid, iets waar mijn broertje en ik moeite mee hadden en mijn moeder absoluut niet. Ik had een hennavlekje in mijn handpalm ter ere van haar bruiloft, waar Hollanders van schrikken als ik mijn hand ophoud om wisselgeld te ontvangen. Aan mijn oor mijn adoptiemoeder die zich verbolgen voelde dat de PVV was uitgesloten van de coalitieonderhandelingen. Dat was ik met haar eens. Ook was ze kwaad en gekwetst over mijn vorige column. Vooral de zin aan het eind, waarin ik suggereerde dat de PVV-stemmer later kon zeggen ‘ik heb het niet geweten’, deed haar pijn.

Ik merkte dat we letterlijk tot twee kampen hoorden. Ik kon niets voelen bij wat zij voelde als zij in Den Haag in de tram zat en overal om zich heen buitenlanders zag en hoorde, en zij kon niets voelen bij wat ik voelde over die anderhalf miljoen mensen die op een man hebben gestemd die mensen uitsluit en discrimineert.

Tegelijk wist ik dat ze het geweldig naar haar zin zou hebben gehad op de henna-avond. Dat ze mijn broertje, die voorgoed naar Turkije wil vertrekken omdat hij zich hier niet thuis voelt, enorm zou mogen, net als ik.
Dat alles samenkomt en mag bestaan, is een wonder. Het is een interessante plek, leven op de kruising van al die culturen.

door: Nazmye Oral

> bron: deVolkskrant

 

Indiase ouders 'Rahul' doen aangifte van kidnapping

E-mail Print PDF
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Indiase ouders 'Rahul' doen aangifte van kidnapping
De zaak rond het geroofde adoptiekind 'Rahul' krijgt een nieuwe wending: het Indiase echtpaar dat claimt dat ze de biologische ouders van de jongen zijn, stappen naar de politie om aangifte te doen van kidnapping.

DNA-test
Het echtpaar kwam vorige week naar Nederland om via de rechter een DNA-test af te dwingen waaruit moet blijken dat de inmiddels twaalfjarige 'Rahul' hun gestolen zoon is.

Ontvoering
De adoptieouders van 'Rahul' weigeren iedere medewerking in de zaak waarna de vermeende biologische ouders op advies van hun Indiase advocaat besloten om de Nederlandse ouders en adoptiebureau Meiling te beschuldigen wegens betrokkenheid bij ontvoering.

In Netwerk de laatste ontwikkelingen in de zaak 'Rahul'.

Bekijk de eerdere Netwerk-reportages over dit onderwerp:

Indiase ouders 'Rahul' in Nederland voor DNA-test
Get  Microsoft Silverlight
Bekijk de video in andere formaten.


Indiase ouders eisen gestolen adoptiekind uit Nederland terug
Get  Microsoft Silverlight
Bekijk de video in andere formaten.


Bekijk hier de uitzending van dinsdag 22 juni

 


Pagina 1 van 24

Bezoekers online

We hebben 25 gasten online

Quote van de dag

Reacties van lezers

Blog: De Wereld is van iedereen

In de chatroom

Momenteel geen gebruikers in de chat

Recent ingelogd

                                               

Zoek